OPEN ACCESSMay 15, 2015

Team-Based Learning Module for Anatomy of the Posterior Upper Limb

    Abstract

    Introduction: This team-based learning (TBL) module was designed for preclinical physician assistant and nurse anesthetist students but is suitable for a variety of medical and health professional students. The resource uses the TBL approach to teach the gross anatomy of the posterior arm, extensor forearm, and dorsum of hand. Methods: The application exercise takes students through the presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of a mid-shaft humeral fracture and sequential development of compartment syndrome. This TBL session includes a preclass assignment in which students are given learning objectives and suggested readings. Results: Student outcomes data was evaluated to determine the effectiveness of this TBL as a supplement to cadaveric dissection. Students of the 2014 course who participated in TBL outscored students of the 2013 course on all written and practical examinations. On average, students who participated in TBL in conjunction with lecture and dissection scored 4.9 percentage points higher on written examinations and 5.0 points higher on practical examinations than those who only participated in lectures and dissections. Discussion: Following administration of this TBL module, it was noted that the application exercises took longer than 1 hour to complete. Therefore, one of the application exercise questions was removed to reduce the length of this phase of the TBL process. We selected the least-challenging question to remove from the module.

    Educational Objectives

    By the end of the module, the learner will be able to:

    1. Describe the anatomy of the posterior arm, extensor forearm, and dorsum of hand.

    2. Apply anatomy to the diagnosis and treatment of neuromusculoskeletal injuries.

    3. Work effectively in small groups to solve a clinical problem.

    References

    • Haidet P, O'Malley KJ, Richards B. 2002. An initial experience with “team learning” in medical education, Acad Med77:40–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200201000-00009MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Huitt TW, Killins A, Brooks WS. 2014. Team-based learning in the gross anatomy laboratory improves academic performance and students' attitudes toward teamwork. Anat Sci Educ.Google Scholar
    • Michaelsen LK, Fink RH, Knight A. 1997. Designing effective group activities: Lessons for classroom teaching and faculty development. In: To Improve the Academy: Resources for Faculty, Instructional and Organizational Development. Stillwater, OK: New Forum Press. p 373-379.Google Scholar
    • Michaelsen LK, Parmelee DX, McMahon KK, Levine RE. 2008. Team-Based Learning for Health Professions Education. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.Google Scholar
    • Nieder GL, Parmelee DX, Stolfi A, Hudes PD. 2005. Team-based learning in a medical gross anatomy and embryology course, Clin Anat18:56–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ca.20040MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Tank PW. 2013. Grant's Dissector, 15th ed: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins.Google Scholar
    • Vasan NS, DeFouw DO, Holland BK. 2008. Modified use of team-based learning for effective delivery of medical gross anatomy and embryology. Anat Sci Educ1:3–9.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ase.5MedlineGoogle Scholar