Online Faculty Development for Implementation and Use of Student Portfolios

Publication ID Published Volume
10436 August 5, 2016 12

Download the Educational Summary Report

Abstract

Over the past decade, portfolios have gained popularity in medical education as tools to evaluate and provide feedback about learning and completion of professionally authentic tasks. Though faculty development has been noted to be key for successful portfolios, there are few available resources. As part of an interinstitutional collaborative project, we have developed online faculty development modules that provide pedagogical information about portfolios, practical advice, and resources from the available literature. The materials associated with this publication include downloadable modules, which take approximately 45 minutes to complete and can be paused at any time, and sample questions to facilitate small-group discussion with faculty either in the planning stage of portfolios or as part of program evaluation of an institution’s portfolios. A survey taken by faculty from four medical schools after completion of the modules showed that they were well received, with 41% of participants stating that they were very knowledgeable after undertaking the modules compared to 11% before undertaking the modules. Faculty reported increased interest in the topic and increased confidence in their ability to undertake planning for development of portfolios at their institution and considered using the modules as a mandatory curriculum for portfolio coaches at their institutions. We suggest that these modules could be used for individual self-development, as part of faculty development sessions for portfolio coaches and mentors, and to provide faculty with background information about portfolios during the planning phase of portfolios at an institution.

Citation

Zaidi Z, Wright A, Bailey M, et al. Online faculty development for implementation and use of student portfolios. MedEdPORTAL Publications. 2016;12:10436. http://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10436

Educational Objectives

After completing the modules, users will be able to:

  1. Describe a competency-based portfolio.
  2. List the typical contents of competency-based portfolios.
  3. Discuss assessment strategies for portfolios.
  4. Explain factors influencing the successful implementation of portfolios.

Keywords

  • Portfolios, Faculty Development, Online

References

  1. Arter JA, Spandel V. Using portfolios of student work in instruction and assessment. Educ Meas Issues Pract. 1992;11(1):36-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1992.tb00230.x
  2. Chertoff J, Wright A, Novak M, et al. Status of portfolios in undergraduate medical education in the LCME accredited US medical school [published online ahead of print December 10, 2015]. Med Teach. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1114595
  3. Driessen EW. Educating the Self-Critical Doctor: Using a Portfolio to Stimulate and Assess Medical Students’ Reflection [doctoral thesis]. Maastricht, the Netherlands: Maastricht University; 2008.
  4. Driessen EW, Van Tartwijk J, Overeem K, Vermunt JD, Van Der Vleuten CP. Conditions for successful reflective use of portfolios in undergraduate medical education. Med Educ. 2005;39(12):1230-1235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02337.x
  5. Driessen E, Van Tartwijk J, Van Der Vleuten C, Wass V. Portfolios in medical education: why do they meet with mixed success? A systematic review. Med Educ. 2007;41(12):1224-1233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02944.x
  6. Driessen E, van Tartwijk J, Vermunt J, van der Vleuten C. Use of portfolios in early undergraduate medical training. Med Teach. 2003;25(1):18-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159021000061378
  7. Fields SA, Toffler WL, Bledsoe NM. Impact of the presence of a third-year medical student on gross charges and patient volumes in 22 rural community practices. Acad Med. 1994;69(10)(suppl):S87-S89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199410000-00052
  8. Kollisch DO, Frasier PY, Slatt L, Storaasli M. Community preceptors’ views of a required third-year family medicine clerkship. Arch Fam Med. 1997;6(1):25-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archfami.6.1.25
  9. Martin B, Briggs LJ. Affective and Cognitive Domains: Integration for Instruction and Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications; 1986.
  10. Milligan C, Littlejohn A. Supporting professional learning in a massive open online course. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learning. 2014;15(5):197-213.
  11. Owen H. Putting the PLE into PLD: virtual professional learning and development. J Educators Online. 2014;11(2).
  12. Steinert Y, Cruess S, Cruess R, Snell L. Faculty development for teaching and evaluating professionalism: from programme design to curriculum change. Med Educ. 2005;39(2):127-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02069.x
  13. Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, et al. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Med Teach. 2006;28(6):497-526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01421590600902976
  14. Tochel C, Haig A, Hesketh A, et al. The effectiveness of portfolios for post-graduate assessment and education: BEME Guide No 12. Med Teach. 2009;31(4):299-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01421590902883056
  15. Van Der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW, Driessen EW, Govaerts MJ, Heeneman S. Twelve tips for programmatic assessment. Med Teach. 2015;37(7):641-646. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.973388
  16. Van Tartwijk J, Driessen EW. Portfolios for assessment and learning: AMEE Guide No. 45. Med Teach. 2009;31(9):790-801. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01421590903139201

Material Access

Please sign in to access this material.

Please register for an AAMC account if you do not have one.

Register

  • Contact Us

ISSN 2374-8265