Use of Simulation to Improve Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Performance and Code Team Communication for Pediatric Residents

Publication ID Published Volume
10555 March 16, 2017 13

Download the Educational Summary Report

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiorespiratory events are infrequent in pediatric teaching hospitals but can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Clear communication within the response team prevents delays in action and allows all team members to contribute to providing optimum management. This resource was developed to simulate high-acuity and low-frequency events for pediatric residents. The scenario options are recurrent supraventricular tachycardia, prolonged QT syndrome, myocarditis, and respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis. Methods: The simulation is best performed in a simulation center with audio- and video-recording capabilities but could also be performed in situ in the pediatric intensive care unit or emergency room. Necessary personnel include a simulation technician and two instructors. A code cart, mock medications, and defibrillator with hands-free pads appropriate for the mannequin are necessary supplies. Critical actions include initial survey and intervention, rhythm recognition, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), use of defibrillator, and administration of anti-arrhythmic medications when needed. At the conclusion of the scenario, a formal debriefing with learners using structured feedback is performed. Results: These cases have been used with groups of pediatric or emergency medicine residents approximately 16 times over the past 3 years. Learners have reported that participation increased their confidence and comfort with management of cardiorespiratory events and that communication technique practice improved their teamwork and sign-out skills. Rhythm recognition and CPR performance scores during the simulation scenarios improved, with subjective improvement during actual cardiorespiratory events. Discussion: This resource advances learner knowledge of Pediatric Advanced Life Support algorithms and teamwork communication and identifies learner knowledge and management deficits.

Citation

Couloures KG, Allen C. Use of simulation to improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance and code team communication for pediatric residents. MedEdPORTAL Publications. 2017;13:10555. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10555

Educational Objectives

By the end of this module, the learner will be able to:

  1. Identify and begin treatment for a patient with cardiorespiratory compromise.
  2. Initiate appropriate monitoring techniques.
  3. Recognize cardiac arrhythmias and provide management applying the Pediatric Advanced Life Support algorithms.
  4. Demonstrate proper use of the defibrillator to perform cardioversion and defibrillation.
  5. Integrate closed-loop communication skills and early role assignment as ways to improve teamwork during resuscitation events.
  6. Utilize SBAR (situation, background, assessment, and response) techniques to provide effective transitions of care.

Keywords

  • Pediatrics, Pediatric Education, Simulation, High Fidelity Simulation Training, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Closed-Loop Communication, Teach-Back Communication, Handover, Patient Handoff

Prior Scholarly Dissemination

Presented as an abstract at the Pediatric Academic Societies Meeting; May 4-7, 2013; Washington, DC.

References

  1. Andreatta P, Saxton E, Thompson M, Annich G. Simulation-based mock codes significantly correlate with improved pediatric patient cardiopulmonary arrest survival rates. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011;12(1):33-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181e89270

  2. Bishop-Kurylo D, Masiello M. Pediatric resuscitation: development of a mock code program and evaluation tool. Pediatr Nurs. 1995;21(4):333-336.

  3. Bordley WC, Travers D, Scanlon P, Frush K, Hohenhaus S. Office preparedness for pediatric emergencies: a randomized, controlled trial of an office-based training program. Pediatrics. 2003;112(2):291-295.

  4. Cheng A, Hunt EA, Donoghue A, et al; for EXPRESS Investigators. Examining pediatric resuscitation using simulation and scripted debriefing: a multicenter randomized trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(6):528-536. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.1389

  5. Donoghue A, Nishisaki A, Sutton R, Hales R, Boulet J. Reliability and validity of a scoring instrument for clinical performance during Pediatric Advance Life Support simulation scenarios. Resuscitation. 2010;81(3):331-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.11.011

  6. Donoghue A, Ventre K, Boulet J, et al; for EXPRESS Pediatric Simulation Research Investigators. Design, implementation, and psychometric analysis of a scoring instrument for simulated pediatric resuscitation: a report from the EXPRESS pediatric investigators. Simul Healthc. 2011;6(2):71-77. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e31820c44da

  7. Friedman D, Zaveri P, O’Connell K. Pediatric mock code curriculum: improving resident resuscitations. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010;26(7):490-494. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181e5bf34

  8. Granneman S, Conn VS. An evaluation of the effectiveness of competency-based code blue education. J Nurs Staff Dev. 1996;12(6):283-288.

  9. Hunt EA, Walker AR, Shaffner DH, Miller MR, Pronovost PJ. Simulation of in-hospital pediatric medical emergencies and cardiopulmonary arrests: highlighting the importance of the first 5 minutes. Pediatrics. 2008:121(1):e34-e43. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-0029

  10. Roy KM, Miller MP, Schmidt K, Sagy M. Pediatric residents experience a significant decline in their response capabilities to simulated life-threatening events as their training frequency in cardiopulmonary resuscitation decreases. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011;12(3):e141-e144. https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181f3a0d1

  11. Semeraro F, Signore L, Cerchiari EL. Retention of CPR performance in anaesthetists. Resuscitation. 2006;68(1):101-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.06.011

  12. Stone K, Reid J. Pediatric emergency medicine simulation curriculum: supraventricular tachycardia. MedEdPORTAL Publications. 2014;10:9716. http://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9716

  13. Tofil NM, White ML, Manzella B, McGill D, Zinkan L. Initiation of a pediatric mock code program at a children’s hospital. Med Teach. 2009;31(6):e241-e247. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590802637974

  14. 2005 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiovascular care (ECC) of pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic life support. Pediatrics. 2006;117(5):e989-e1004. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-0219

  15. Uspal N, Stone K, Reid J, Coleman-Satterfield T. Pediatric emergency medicine simulation curriculum: bronchiolitis. MedEdPORTAL Publications. 2015;11:10012. http://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10012

  16. van Schaik SM, Von Kohorn I, O’Sullivan P. Pediatric resident confidence in resuscitation skills relates to mock code experience. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2008;47(8):777-783. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922808316992

  17. White JRM, Shugerman R, Brownlee C, Quan L. Performance of advanced resuscitation skills by pediatric housestaff. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152(12):1232-1235. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.152.12.1232

Material Access

Please sign in to access this material.

Please register for an AAMC account if you do not have one.

Register

  • Contact Us

Subscribe to Our Quarterly Newsletter

Receive featured content & announcements!

ISSN 2374-8265