Original Publication
Open Access

Case-Based Discussion: Hypertension

Published: January 8, 2015 | 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9994

Included in this publication:

  • Case 3 Hypertension for publication.docx
  • Case 3 Hypertension for publication student version.docx

To view all publication components, extract (i.e., unzip) them from the downloaded .zip file.

Editor's Note: This publication predates our implementation of the Educational Summary Report in 2016 and thus displays a different format than newer publications.


Introduction: Experienced health physicians must synthesize and integrate information from multiple sources and disciplines. In order to foster this skill, undergraduate medical curricula must provide ample opportunities for guided practice, particularly in the earlier years of training. Case-based discussions (CBD) have emerged as an effective method to promote student learning and satisfaction. Different methodologies of CBD-teaching have been used to teach physiology with positive outcomes, including the promotion of better understanding of integration of physiological systems, and enhanced student performance when compared to lecture alone. This case was created in order to provide an opportunity to integrate physiology with clinical skills and to introduce students to elements of pathophysiology and clinical reasoning. Methods: This 2-hour CBD was implemented in a first-year physiology course for undergraduate medical students. Prior to this CBD session, students learned basic principles of cardiovascular and renal physiology, the function of the autonomic nervous system, and acid-base homeostasis. The case is about a 72-year-old man with hypertension who is ultimately diagnosed with renal artery stenosis. Students were expected to explain the physiology of blood pressure control and to use their basic science knowledge as a framework to discuss a clinical presentation of secondary hypertension. In addition, to promote self-directed learning, students were asked to complete a clinical inquiry activity. As a group, students identified additional areas of basic or clinical interest and worked together to explore and answer their own questions. Results: Overall, the case was well received and students feel that it significantly contribute to their learning (54% of students strongly agree and 33% of students agree). Discussion: We are satisfied with the student responses on surveys and examinations. The small-group format provides the students with the opportunity to meet their learning needs and to receive individual feedback; it also allows faculty to identify students at risk. In our experience, the major limiting factor is the need to have a large number of adequately trained small-group facilitators to equalize the experiences between groups. It is our goal to expand this approach throughout the first year.

Educational Objectives

By the end of this session, learners will be able to:

  1. Recognize physical exam findings suggestive of chronic hypertension.
  2. Explain why serum creatinine concentration may be used as a measure of renal function.
  3. Explain the physiological factors and systems controlling blood pressure.
  4. Predict how alterations in renal function lead to changes in blood pressure.
  5. Interpret an arterial blood gas.

Author Information

  • Jenny Fortun, PhD: Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine
  • Rebecca Toonkel: Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine
  • Yerko Berrocal: Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine

None to report.

None to report.


Fortun J, Toonkel R, Berrocal Y. Case-based discussion: hypertension. MedEdPORTAL. 2015;11:9994. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9994